More than Head Knowledge

In the article "How Should Colleges Prepare Students To Succeed In Today's Global Economy?" Peter D. Hart Research Associates, Inc. discusses a gap between higher education and the business world. This article brings to light that employers are not necessarily looking for someone who is completely specialized to their field, but instead, they are searching for people who have the ability to take information and apply it in real life. They want good communicators who have a balance in general education and more specialized education.

This goes hand in hand with the Honors Program at JBU. One ability a student in the Honors Program is expected to possess is the ability to apply knowledge to real life situations (II). They are expected to take what they learn in class and to apply it to their everyday. One example is in my English Comp class. In that class, I am refining my reading and summary skills; these skills are then transferred to different areas of my life such as another class. Also, it affects my personal non-academic life through changing the way I study the Bible or read devotionals. As it says in the above article, employers are looking for these skills in potential candidates, and I believe that not just the honors program but JBU as a college presents it's students with the ability to possess these qualities.

Alternative Education

These past few weeks in Honors orientation, we have been learning about education and discussing some issues in education that are flawed. For this assignment, we were asked to look at some alternative education system employed by many colleges around the US. One such college is Evergreen State University. At Evergreen, they do not measure a students learning by grades; however, they are evaluated by professors and themselves through detailed personal narratives. Their websites states that this has been widely accepted by employers because it is more detailed and personal than letter grades. 

Comparing this school to JBU, there are many differences. The main one, of course, is JBU has grades. At JBU, many students strive to maintain a certain GPA, whether it is for honors, scholarships, or just a personal goal. I believe this is good because it gives students something for which to strive; however, they can be a downfall where a student is focused just on the letter grade that they overlook actually learning and retaining the material. In academics I also see how the two colleges are alike. Like JBU’s professors, Evergreen’s professors seem that they are truly there to teach the students, and they want them to succeed. 

I personally believe I would do well in the type of learning at Evergreen. One point they made was that their classes were actually programs. They studied a variety of subjects in one class, with the help of labs and field trips. The reason I think I would excel in this type of education is I like to see how different subjects fit together. For example, my high school humanities class combined history, literature, geography, poetry, and music all into one class. With this I was able to learn how they all connected and fed off of each other. This type of learning makes sense to me and I enjoy learning this way.

Jack and Jill

One of my biggest struggles this year has been changing my learning strategy. In high school, grades came easy to me. I did not really have to try and was rewarded, through grades, for my lack of effort. Through the realization of what quality learning is, this learning just for a grade is something I am trying to avoid. I believe that a quality education comes from attaining and retaining knowledge. It is not based solely on test scores but on what you take out of the class and how it affects your life. 

In my own education, I now try to strive for quality education where I really learn something from the class that moves past the answers on the test. As I said above, I did not do this in high school which normally resulted in me forgetting most things after the test. I knew the information for the test and that was it. It meant nothing more to me. However in college, I have seen my goal shift to actually understanding and implementing the skills I use outside of the class. I measure my quality of my learning in my classes normally based on if I am paying attention or not, if I am just sitting in class staring at the teacher or if my mind is actually engaging what the professor is saying which results in actual gaining and retaining of knowledge. Hopefully, I will be able to continue this goal. I am here to learn, with quality learning, and I hope to take every opportunity to do so.

The Pedagogy of the Opressed

In chapter two in The Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Paul Freire discusses two types of education. The first is teaching through the "banking concept" and the second is "problem posing." The only thing these two types of teaching have in common is they are both used to educate a person.

In the banking concept, the focus is primarily on the teacher. The students are just objects to receive the great and wonderful information the teacher is narrating. There is not really interaction between the teacher and the student, and most of the time the “learning” from this type of education is actually just the memorization and regurgitation of facts. I have personally experienced this in a Bible class I took in high school. In this class, I loved the teacher outside of the classroom; however, in the classroom, the teacher was very dogmatic about how we learned. Basically, the class was contrived of the teacher lecturing us on how to have a relationship with God, and how to study. The students did not have much input and were expected to just receive the information as truth.

The opposite of the banking concept would be the use of problem posing. Problem posing consists of the teacher becoming a teacher student, where they learn from the feedback and responses from the students. Also, the students become the student-teacher, where they are influenced greatly by what the teacher says but also have influence over the teacher’s ideas about an issue. I personally experienced this with my fourth grade teacher. It was her first year to teach at my school. This year was great because while we were learning, she was also learning about how to teach. She would constantly adjust her teaching strategies to help us. Because of this, the class was fun and I personally learned a lot.

So looking back over these two teaching strategies it is obvious that they are very different. Banking is more about the recitation of memorized facts and problem posing is about the interaction of the teachers and students resulting in combined learning.

Hmm. What do you think?

So now, reading the last two posts, it is obvious what I think about my gifts and strengths. However, is this what other people see in me? To answer this question, I made a survey note on Facebook asking at least four of my friends or family members to answer three questions about me.
The questions consisted of:
1. What do you think I am most passionate about?
2. What do you think I'm good at?
3. What do you see me doing or being in ten years?
In the end, I received responses from my friends Laine and Lauren (both know me very well), and also from my brother, Jesse and my mommy, Allison.

When looking over the answers to the survey, there is a constant theme that runs throughout. Whether it's working with kids, or meeting people's needs, the overall consensus is I am passionate about people. They also think that I am good at listening to people, brightening people's day, being a friend to everyone, and taking people at face value. In ten years, they all see me as being a mom (only my mom said wife though which kind of worries me :P) and two see me as a full-time missionary.

I believe that these responses are pretty accurate in how I view myself. The answers didn't really surprise me and greatly fit with what I think about myself. However, it did encourage me in the fact that others see this of me too. I am particularly encouraged by the two that see me in full time missions. Sometimes the thought of what I am going to do on the mission field and how I am going to get to the place I am supposed to be overwhelms me, but it is helpful to see that other believe in my dream and also see it coming true.

Calling 9/15/2010

Since being here at JBU I have really been able to look into and to evaluate what my spiritual gifts and strengths are. For my Gateway class I took a spiritually strengths assessment test thing, and in Honors Orientation I had the opportunity to complete a spiritually gifts assessment. The results are as follows.

My top five spiritual strengths are: Adaptability, Belief, Ideation, Developer, and Responsibility

My top two spiritual gifts (as seen in the last post) are: Missionary and Discernment

When looking at these two lists, I quickly see how they fit together. Mainly, I see how each of my strengths can be used to develop my gift of missionaryness.

The first being adaptability. I can see this coming into play when life doesn’t go according to my plan. It will be easy for me to adapt to new plans and quickly change my course of action.

Next, is belief. One thing in being a missionary is that you have to be strongly grounded in your faith. The field brings many trials and without a strong foundation it is easy to be crushed. I believe that belief allows me to have a strong foundation on which to rest. I know what I believe and I know what ground is good for standing.

My third spiritual gift ideation helps me create new ideas to be pursued on the mission field. There are so many possibilities of what I could do on the mission field running around that sometimes I do not know where to start.

 Fourthly, with the gift of developer, I am able to take these ideas out of my head and put them into action. With this I also see the potential in people which I believe is and important trait when sharing Christ with people.

 Lastly, Responsibility. This means that I like doing what I say I’m going to do. In fact, it I get extremely frustrated when I don’t have the ability to finish something to which I have committed. In the missions field I think this will allow me to get things done. Like developer it will drive my ideas into a tangible existence.

When looking back through this list, I am reminded about who God is. If he gives someone a passion and a desire to do something, he is going to equip them for the task. God does not taunt dreams and ambitions in our face only to watch us fail because we are not equipped. So looking at this fit of gifts and strengths, I am overwhelmed with God’s love and care for his children and their dreams. God is great.  

Calling 9/10/2010

Nailed on the head! So I took my spiritual gifts test and the top two results were missionary and discernment. As my first sentence suggests, I believe that these truly describe my desires and calling in life

.

My first gift, according to the test, is missionary. Surprisingly, this is what my end goal is. I would like to be a missionary and I am drawn to people overseas. The site that I took this test on states that people with the missionary gift “have an intense spirit of unease at the thought of all the unsaved people in the world,” and “desire to minister to unreached people in other communities or countries.” When reading these two phrases, I feel as if they describe me. Over the course of my high school years through mission trips and church retreats, my love and compassion for missions developed. In my mission trip to New Orleans my sophomore year, I developed a heart for last people. I am not quite sure how to articulate this feeling, but I can only say that my heart hurt for people who didn’t even have the chance to know Christ. I have every desire to make this truth known to everybody and it deeply grieves me that people go through life without once hearing the good news of how much Christ loves us and what He did for us through the cross. To me, life without feeling the love of Christ is no life at all, and my greatest desire is to share Christ’s love to everyone.

My second gift is discernment. I almost feel cocky when I talk about this, so this summary might be a little shorter. I believe this gift truly describes me. Like the definition explains, I am good at deciding what truth is and what error is. It is easy for me to pick out fallacies in logic and to decide what is good to take in and listen to and what is not. I believe this gift has greatly helped me in difficult times in my life because I usually know what is right. It has also been a good foundation on which my faith can rest. One thing I enjoy with this gift is utilizing it to help my friends through troubles. This gift allows me to think rationally about a situation and give advice that applies. So, I guess what I’m really trying to say is that this gift of discernment has played a big role in my life. Without it I would make lot of stupid mistakes and probably have a lot more broken bone stories.

So here is it my two biggest gifts. Hopefully I described them well enough and it makes sense!